Archive for the ‘McD’s Gambling Problem’ Category
Thursday, October 29th, 2009
Record after week eight: 91-48, 68-70-1 AS
12 pm ET
Purdue (3-5) at Wisconsin (5-2) (-7)
I would love it if Purdue would soften Wisconsin up for IU a little. Won't happen, of course, because Purdue sucks just as bad as Indiana these days, but it'd still be nice. Don't watch this game ...
Posted in College Football, McD College Football '09, McD's Gambling Problem | 3 Comments »
Friday, October 23rd, 2009
In case you're wondering, I'm using the BCS rankings from here on out, which may explain why Oklahoma isn't ranked at all in the picks. The real question would be: why does the AP Poll think a 3-3 OU team that has lost to every ranked team it has played ...
Posted in College Football, McD College Football '09, McD's Gambling Problem | No Comments »
Saturday, October 17th, 2009
10 am ET: Morning! Once again, Gameday is starting on ESPN, and this time I'm still asleep.
We'll be updating from the Rumors and Rants War Room/Man Cave all afternoon this week, since it's homecoming and the biggest game of the year for everyone on this here site's alma mater: Indiana ...
Posted in College Football, McD College Football '09, McD's Gambling Problem | 5 Comments »
Friday, October 16th, 2009
Can you believe we're halfway through the season already? This is crazy. Plus, I'm taking a beating against the spread so far, so enjoy the train wreck all day Saturday!
Record after week six: 64-42, 50-55-1 AS
12 pm ET
Northwestern (4-2) at Michigan State (3-3) (-13.5)
A good appetizer, were there no other ...
Posted in College Football, McD College Football '09, McD's Gambling Problem | No Comments »
Saturday, October 10th, 2009
10 am ET: Morning! Gameday is just starting, and I'm on my way to yet another expecting parents class with the wife. I will, in fact, be very well entertained today, just not with football until 2:45 or so. I'll be updating all day to see how badly I failed ...
Posted in College Football, General, McD College Football '09, McD's Gambling Problem | 2 Comments »
