Comments on: So Which Team Will T.O. Ruin Next? http://rumorsandrants.com/2009/03/so-which-team-will-to-ruin-next.html Goes Down Easy With Little Or No Aftertaste Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:43:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Santa Claustrophobia http://rumorsandrants.com/2009/03/so-which-team-will-to-ruin-next.html/comment-page-1#comment-7846 Santa Claustrophobia Sat, 07 Mar 2009 05:06:23 +0000 http://rumorsandrants.com/?p=5826#comment-7846 Actually, the way it looks is that a team is better by having T.O. on it because they can't afford to pay anybody else as a WR. Then he leaves cause people get tired of his crap and they struggle to fill the gap. The Eagles did better on that front because they had more to work with. Now try an imagine Owens trying to share plays with another quality receiver. That sure sounds like a winning combination. And nobody has made the obvious Raiders/T.O. connection? For shame! Actually, the way it looks is that a team is better by having T.O. on it because they can’t afford to pay anybody else as a WR. Then he leaves cause people get tired of his crap and they struggle to fill the gap. The Eagles did better on that front because they had more to work with.

Now try an imagine Owens trying to share plays with another quality receiver. That sure sounds like a winning combination.

And nobody has made the obvious Raiders/T.O. connection? For shame!

]]> By: Cousin Charlie http://rumorsandrants.com/2009/03/so-which-team-will-to-ruin-next.html/comment-page-1#comment-7840 Cousin Charlie Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:07:28 +0000 http://rumorsandrants.com/?p=5826#comment-7840 Um, I vote not the Bears. I can see Kyle Orton overdosing on Jack Daniels after T.O. rips into him on the sidelines for missing him deep. We just can't do that to our K.0. Um, I vote not the Bears. I can see Kyle Orton overdosing on Jack Daniels after T.O. rips into him on the sidelines for missing him deep. We just can’t do that to our K.0.

]]> By: Job http://rumorsandrants.com/2009/03/so-which-team-will-to-ruin-next.html/comment-page-1#comment-7839 Job Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:02:39 +0000 http://rumorsandrants.com/?p=5826#comment-7839 I made the same point in a comment. The truth is that teams are better off keeping him. Look at Philly. Romo? Please watch him throwing to Witten and tell me if he is as good as they say. T.O. is just one of the greats, but he is a pain. As much as football is about toughness, teams should be better able to deal with him, or? I made the same point in a comment. The truth is that teams are better off keeping him. Look at Philly. Romo? Please watch him throwing to Witten and tell me if he is as good as they say. T.O. is just one of the greats, but he is a pain. As much as football is about toughness, teams should be better able to deal with him, or?

]]> By: Phillips http://rumorsandrants.com/2009/03/so-which-team-will-to-ruin-next.html/comment-page-1#comment-7838 Phillips Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:53:07 +0000 http://rumorsandrants.com/?p=5826#comment-7838 Actually, our point was that he'll go somewhere, and while it might be good for a short time, he'll wear out his welcome, get released and leave the team worse off in the end. Actually, our point was that he’ll go somewhere, and while it might be good for a short time, he’ll wear out his welcome, get released and leave the team worse off in the end.

]]> By: chase http://rumorsandrants.com/2009/03/so-which-team-will-to-ruin-next.html/comment-page-1#comment-7836 chase Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:02:12 +0000 http://rumorsandrants.com/?p=5826#comment-7836 your facts contradict your point. each team he has been on is significantly better than they were without him. your article is basically proof that the Cowboys will suck this year. if they have any sort of success at all it will be breaking what is clearly a consistent trend. your facts contradict your point. each team he has been on is significantly better than they were without him. your article is basically proof that the Cowboys will suck this year. if they have any sort of success at all it will be breaking what is clearly a consistent trend.

]]>